![]() ![]() ![]() Just because they have to consolidate first the two apps that have been launched, among other things, to keep the brand strong (other way would be a total sink), that is, Affinity. The other way is getting the bad stuff of both worlds, imo.Īlso, it is your view -please, excuse me for expressing it so, is how I perceive it- that they need a merge or join forces with other mid/small company. That, besides usually when one builds a company, one wants to make things in own way, otherwise would choose the **much** easier life (also easier than freelancing) of just getting a high salary and just obey orders, without any further responsibilities. So that they can sell big later, or, simply become a major competitor (as in the long run can be in this case much more benefitial, profitable than a static one pay (IMO, opposite case of a plugin, extra library/addon for an existing package)). I am guessing producing something of the highest value possible before any merge would occur would be the clever thing here, and surely the only aim. They, at least at this size, smaller or bigger, are wanting to create their own product in also their own way. I have been in several software developer studios. So, is mostly a proposal for the company to adhere to some other medium sized company. We then agree that associating with the major monopoly (top dog) would be a total stall operation, good, that's an advance. SrPx, I think we are talking past each other.īelieve me, not only I am trying to reply accurately, I am even trying to agree in some points. Apple is just about ready to put out an iMac Pro that is significantly faster then my iMac and I already have no problem with performance of that machine at all.Īdobe didn't kill the competing products they killed some of them, most notably the bulk of Macromedia, but there is a long list of competing products out there it's just that they don't want to work together to become a serious response to Adobe. It just whizzes along without any slow down or noise at all. R C-R, I have no problem with my hardware at all, I have none of the issues you brought up anymore. A layout company has to decide on what the basics are for most people and then provide access to third parties to provide custom solutions. The important part about third party plug-in support is that what one person considers essential to their workflow another considers bloat. I don't think Serif needs to be a massive 20 product company but if they were a 5 or 6 product company that would be at least enough to take them seriously (I am not including Serif's pre-Affinity line into that number as they said that line would be discontinued to replace it with Affinity.) The problem in my eyes is that no one is a real competitor to Adobe just lots of small fish trying to take on the big fish but that doesn't work. I am not saying Adobe and Serif should merge I am saying that it would be beneficial to work along side other one product companies so that Serif can at least be a medium sized fish to against Adobe the big fish. So if I would like to create some textframes and have them all on Dutch spelling check, I just change the language of the base style to Dutch and make sure at least some style is selected when creating the textframes (like the 'Body'-style) and everything is checked in Dutch.Īnd if I would like to have a different body styling per textframe I would just copy the Body-style to a new style and even that style still has dutch as a language, because it's still inheriting from the base-style, which is set to Dutch.SrPx, I think we are talking past each other. Except for when we change a style to not inherit that language from the base style, but set to a different language for that style.Īnd when we have set a style to a textframe, or only to one or more characters, words or lines inside it, even then, we can still override the spelling language in the Character-tab for only a selection of text! So if we have a textframe full of Dutch text we are still able to select a word or a line and put that piece to be spelling-checked in Spanish. So the spelling language could actually be set to the base style once per document so we have the same language throughout the whole document. ![]() In APub, you can have the Base paragraph style (and different Base styles, or paragraph styles) in the langages you need for spellchecking (I don't use Paragraph styles in AD or AP, but you can find a Language > Spelling option in the Character panel). ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |